Letterbox 1080p1/3/2024 I've never noticed any increase in latency nor any frame drops in these situations, and I've played on it for years. The unused real estate pixels remain unlit. My own experience with *1200 is limited to one model, an old 1600x1200 Belinea, and with 1080p or 720p it doesn't seem to upscale the full frame (I suspect it's just zooming, keeping the ratio, until it hits borders). People creating those chips definitely did not care for latency =(Īre you sure about that, since it's so rare what concrete exemples do we have ? Very lame is that such scalers add input lag when signal match one specified with EDID but it is how it is, we cannot do anything with it. That doesn't mean it will support 1080p properly though but having scaler and not supporting is more of an issue of such monitor being totally lame than anything else. Any monitor which skips frames use such scalers. If your device output frames at different frequency then such scaler will even skip frames to keep feeding panel the same exact signal. Industrial scalers will grab whole frame, then do whole screen scaling on it and throw it always with specified parameters. Unfortunately it won't be done in 10% of frame time but >100% of frame time. While it does require quite a lot of memory it can actually be done with minimal amount of input lag which could be under 10% of frame time. With 16:9 to 16:10 you need to grab whole frame and then redraw it differently. Lines are drawn horizontally so you need to grap one or two lines and redraw them slightly differently. Well prad indeed do the most, but that seems completely review and reviewer dependent as it's sometimes quite comprehensive (still lacking precision though), sometimes so laconic it doesn't help the reader much.Īnd damn obligatory google translate again! if only tftcentral and pcmonitors would get serious about I though it's usually interlaced and non-common resolutions/rates requiring a minimum of 1 frame buffering, when traditional pc & ntsc resolutions on their end are normally upscaled in a flash by most intergrated scalers ? (letter/pillar-boxing or not)ĭoing 4:3 to 16:9 letterbox is very easy and can be done using relatively small amount of memory. The issue I think is that every reviewer on Earth - no exceptions - assumes that nobody cares or it's so unimportant that it doesn't require thorough testing. Which 16:10/1200 monitors really do handle justified 16:9 proprely ? (with comprehensive testing and actual proof please)Īll reviewers should check a wider array of resolutions/aspects, as well as alternative framerates and interlaced or film modes.for ALL inputs, and not just using a single PC but also external devices like consoles and BR players, and why not mobile devices when the monitor features MHL or similar.Īlso with a real dedicated section, not brief paragraphs that leave many details and results out. In english reviews we don't have enough and we don't know shit, which leads to always more confusion.Ĭheck NCX's list of 1200p monitors, well the PB248Q is listed as one of the only two 16:10 known to handle justified 16:9 from external devices. Only possible downside is that output resolutions are "just" 800×600, 1024×768, 1280×768, 1360×768, 1440×900, 1600×900, 1280×1024, 1400×1050, 1600×1200, 1920×1200, so you can't get higher than 1920x1200, but that's ok for me, as that's the resolution I wanted for my monitor.Ĭlick to expand.This doesn't tell if they have tried the same on all inputs, mayeb we should assume, but how do we know for sure ?Īnyway, other reviews are either in Czech or Russian or Korean and it's a real pain making out anything clear and comprehensive out of this. Example: input 1280x720, output 1600x1200 -> visible image will be full 1600x1200īy reading this description, I assume "non-scaled original aspect ratio" is the same as 1:1 pixel mapping. This mode will stretch/shrink the input video to always fit the entire size of the output format. Black bars are added on all sides If the input video size is bigger than the output then the video is scaled according to the longest side similarly as in the #1 option. No scaling takes place if the output video resolution is higher than the input resolution. ![]() The input video will be "dropped" in the middle of the output format. ![]() Example: input 1280x720, output 1600x1200 -> image will be 1600x900 with black bars on top and bottom This mode will retain the input aspect ratio and scale the input video to fit the longest side of the output format to maximize the size.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |